EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Seven shipments of hickory shad eggs (28.7 million eggs) were received at Van Dyke in 2005. Egg viability was 61.4%
and 17.6 million hickory shad larvae were stocked in Conowingo Reservoir and in the Delaware
River and its tributaries, Pennypack Creek and Ridley Creek.
A total of 42 shipments of American
shad eggs (17.1 million eggs) was received at Van Dyke in 2005. Total egg viability was 37%
and survival of viable eggs to stocking was 87%, resulting in production of 5.2 million larvae.
Larvae were stocked in the Juniata River (2.2 million), Susquehanna River near Montgomery Ferry (1.0 million), the
West Branch Susquehanna River (335 thousand), the Lehigh River (669 thousand), the Schuylkill River (799 thousand)
and the Delaware River (170 thousand). Scheduled releases in the North Branch Susquehanna River, the Chemung River,
and the four lower river tributaries were cancelled due to lack of eggs.
Overall survival of larvae was 87%. No episodes
of major mortality occurred as a result of larvae lying on the bottom of the tank or any
other cause. Van Dyke jars with foam bottom jars were used only twice with no mortality problems.
All
American and hickory shad larvae cultured at Van Dyke were marked by 4-hour immersion in
oxytetracycline. Marks for American shad were assigned based on release site and/or egg source
river. Mark retention for American shad was 100% for all groups analyzed. Hickory shad were marked at 512 ppm on
day three. Mark retention for hickory shad was 100%. A single tank of larvae (A32) was given an experimental mark
at 3, 6, 9 and 12 days of age. The day 6 and 12 marks utilized generic Oxytetracycline hydrochloride from Am Tech
at 171-ppm and 342-ppm, respectively. Mark retention was 61% for the 171-ppm concentration and 83% for the 342-ppm
concentration. Marks produced by this product were not as bright at those produced by Pfizer Terramycin 343.
INTRODUCTION
The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission has operated the Van Dyke Research Station for
Anadromous Fishes since 1976 as part of an effort to restore diadromous fishes to the Susquehanna
River Basin. The objectives of the Van Dyke Station were to research culture techniques for
American shad and to rear juveniles for release into the Juniata and Susquehanna Rivers.
The program goal was to develop a stock of shad imprinted to the Susquehanna drainage, which will subsequently return
to the river as spawning adults. With the completion of York Haven Dam fish passage facilities in 2000, upstream
hydroelectric project owners were no longer responsible for funding the hatchery effort. Funding was provided by
the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission.
In 2003, a new effort in migratory fish restoration was undertaken. Adult
hickory shad (Alosa mediocris) were collected and tank-spawned as part of the initial efforts
to culture, release and restore runs of hickory shad to the Susquehanna and Delaware River
basins.
As in previous years, production goals for American shad for 2005 were to stock 10-20 million American shad
larvae. All Van Dyke hatchery-reared American and hickory shad larvae were marked by immersion
in tetracycline bath treatments in order to distinguish hatchery-reared shad from those produced
by natural spawning of wild adults. All eggs received at Van Dyke were disinfected to prevent
the spread of infectious diseases from out-of-basin sources.
EGG SHIPMENTS
Hickory shad
A total of 28.7 million hickory
shad eggs (73.5 L) were received in seven shipments from tank-spawning operations at Conowingo
Dam (Table 1). Some 17.6 million (61.4%) of the hickory shad eggs were viable.
American shad
A total of 17.1 million American shad eggs (372 L) were received in 42 shipments in 2005
(Table 1). This was the second lowest quantity of eggs received since 1982 (Table 2). Egg
collections were reduced as a result of a late start on the Hudson River. Egg collection
was delayed 7 to 10 days while the contractor resolved permit reporting issues from 2004.
Overall American shad egg viability (which we define
as the percentage which ultimately hatches) was 36.6%.


Thirteen
Hudson River egg shipments (2.9 million eggs) were received from May 19 to June 5, 2005.
Overall viability was 72.4%. By comparison, in 2003, 23 shipments were received from the
Hudson River for a total of 17.1 million eggs. Hudson River eggs were collected from sites
at Coxsackie and Lower Schodack Island.
Delaware River egg shipments were received from May
9 to June 2. A total of 18 shipments were received (6.2 million eggs) with a viability of
31.80%. By comparison, in 2004, the Delaware River produced 2.4 million eggs.
The U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service attempted to obtain eggs by strip-spawning ripe adult shad collected
by gill net in the lower Susquehanna River near Lapidum, MD. This effort resulted in insufficient
eggs to justify a shipment to the hatchery.
Normandeau Associates, under contract with the
PFBC, attempted to obtain eggs by strip-spawning ripe adult shad collected by gill net in
the upper portion of Conowingo Reservoir. Few ripe shad were collected and no eggs were shipped.
American
shad eggs were also obtained from a tank-spawning effort at Conowingo Dam, operated by Normandeau
Associates. Pre-spawn adult American shad were obtained from the West Fish Lift at Conowingo
Dam, injected with hormones and allowed to spawn naturally. Some 8.0 million eggs, in 11 shipments, were delivered
to the Van Dyke Hatchery, with a viability of 23.9%. By comparison, 4.7 million eggs, in 7 shipments, were received
from this source in 2004.
SURVIVAL
Overall survival of American shad larvae was 87% compared to a range of 19% to
94% for the period 1984 through 2004. The 27% increase in survival from 2004 (60%) was due,
in part, to stocking larvae earlier. In 2004, we reared the larvae longer, while waiting
for river flows and turbidity to decrease. Average age at stocking was 15.2 days in 2005,
compared to 23.4 days in 2004.
Survival of individual tanks followed patterns similar to those
observed in the past. Four tanks, reared from 20 to 26 days of age, exhibited 20-d survival
of 83.6% (Figure 1). Nine tanks, reared from 14 to 17 days of age, exhibited 14-d survival
of 88.9%. Eleven tanks, reared from 10 to 13 days of age, exhibited 10-d survival of 94.1%. High mortality episodes
occurred only in low density tanks (15,000 to 57,000 larvae), with the lowest survival in
the lowest density tanks. The cause of the low survival in low density tanks is unknown.
Feed rates were adjusted to feed as if 100,000 larvae were in each tank to ensure that the larvae could find the
feed. Tank I41 was a result of pair spawning Delaware River brood fish for a genetics study conducted
by the Northeast Fishery Center at Lamar. These fish were not tagged with tetracycline and
were not stocked.

LARVAL PRODUCTION
Hickory shad larvae (5.4 million)
were stocked in the lower Susquehanna River at Muddy Creek Access in the Conowingo Reservoir.
Some 11.8 million hickory shad were also stocked in the Delaware River (3.2 million) and
two of its tributaries Pennypack Creek (8.0 million) and Ridley Creek (600 thousand).
Production
and stocking of American shad larvae, summarized in Tables 2, 3 and 4, totaled 5.21 million.
A total of 2.2 million was released in the Juniata River, 1.0 million in the Susquehanna
River near Montgomery Ferry, and 335 thousand in the West Branch Susquehanna River. Due to
the poor egg production, no larvae were stocked in the North Branch Susquehanna River (PA
or NY), the Chemung River, the Raritan River, or the four lower river tributaries. Delaware
River egg collections were sufficient to nearly meet the goals for the Delaware River Basin.
Larvae were stocked in the Lehigh River (669 thousand), the Schuylkill River (799 thousand),
and the Delaware River (170 thousand). Larvae stocked in the Delaware River were allocated to replenish the Delaware
for the brood stock taken there. Larvae stocked during the second of two trips to the Delaware (6/28/05) were observed
to be heavily preyed upon by indigenous shad, 1 to 1 ½ inches
in length.


TETRACYCLINE MARKING
All American and hickory shad
larvae stocked received marks produced by immersion in tetracycline (Table 5). Immersion
marks for American shad were administered by bath treatments in 256-ppm oxytetracycline hydrochloride
for 4h duration. All American shad larvae were marked according to stocking site and/or egg
source. All hickory shad larvae were marked with 512-ppm and given a single mark on day 3.
American shad larvae from the Susquehanna River egg source, and stocked in the Juniata River
or Susquehanna River near Montgomery Ferry were given a triple mark at 3, 6, and 9 days of
age. Larvae from the Hudson River egg source and stocked in the Juniata River or Susquehanna
River near Montgomery Ferry were marked at 3, 6 and 12 days of age. Larvae stocked in the
West Branch Susquehanna River were given a quintuple mark at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 days of
age. Larvae stocked in the Lehigh River were given a triple mark at 9, 12, and 15 days of
age. Larvae stocked in the Schuylkill River were given a quadruple mark at 3, 6, 9, and 12
days of age. Larvae stocked in the Delaware River were given a quintuple mark at 3, 9, 12,
15, and 18 days of age.

A single tank of larvae (A32) was given an experimental
mark at 3, 6, 9 and 12 days of age and stocked in the Schuylkill River. Marks on days 3 and
9 were standard marks at 256-ppm OTC, using Terramycin 343 from Pfizer under INAD 8512. The
day 6 and 12 marks utilized generic Oxytetracycline hydrochloride from Am Tech at 171-ppm
and 342-ppm, respectively. This product is approved by FDA for marking skeletal tissue of
fish and has fewer record-keeping and reporting requirements.
Verification of mark retention
was accomplished by stocking groups of marked fry in raceways and examining otolith samples
collected later. Otoliths were extracted and mounted in Permount on microscope slides. A
thin section was produced by grinding the otolith on both sides. Otolith sections were examined
for marks with an epi-fluorescent microscope with a UV light source. Retention of tetracycline
marks for American shad was 100% for all groups analyzed (Table 5).
Mark retention was 100%
for all American shad production marks sampled (Table 5). Mark retention could not be evaluated
for the day 9,12,15 mark (larvae stocked in the Lehigh River) because none of the larvae
stocked in the raceway survived. The experimental mark (Tank A32) using Amtech oxytetracycline
HCL was not successful. Marks produced by immersion in 256-ppm Terramycin 343 on days 3 and
9 exhibited 100% retention with good or excellent mark ratings on all 18 specimens examined.
Marks produced by immersion in 171-ppm Amtech Oxytetracycline hydrochloride on day 6 exhibited
61% retention with a single good mark, ten poor marks, and 7 unmarked specimens, of the 18
examined. Marks produced by immersion in 342-ppm Amtech Oxytetracycline hydrochloride on
day 12 exhibited 83% retention with eight excellent marks, six good marks, one poor mark,
and 3 unmarked specimens, of the 18 examined.
Fingerlings grown out in raceways and marked
with 88g Amtech oxytetracycline HCL per kg of food exhibited mark retention of five percent.
In previous years, feed marks using the same concentration of Terramycin 343 exhibited mark
retention of 100% (Hendricks 1998, 1999, 2002). The cause of the poor performance of Amtech
Oxytetracycline hydrochloride as an immersion and feed marking agent is not known.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission began culturing hickory shad for the first time
in 2003. We thank biologists Brian Richardson and Rick Morin from the Maryland Fisheries
Service for their assistance in this new initiative. PFBC fisheries biologist Dave Arnold
and his crew collected American shad eggs from the Delaware River. American shad eggs from
the Hudson River were collected under contract with The Wyatt Group from Lancaster, PA. Collection
of American shad for eggs and otolith analysis, from the Susquehanna River
below Conowingo Dam, was done by Richard St. Pierre, Mike Mangold, Tina McCrobie, Steve Minkkinen,
Sheila Eyler, and Clif Tipton of the U.S Fish Wildlife Service, and Gary “Rooster” Potter of Perryville,
Md. Shad eggs from the Susquehanna River above Conowingo Dam were collected under contract
with Normandeau Associates, of Drumore, PA. Normandeau Associates also conducted the tank
spawning operation for both hickory shad and American shad at Conowingo Dam. PECO Energy
provided broodstock, space and technical assistance in the tank spawning operations.
REFERENCES
Brooks, R. C., R. C. Heidinger, and C. C. Kohler. 1994. Mass-marking otoliths of larval and
juvenile walleyes by immersion in oxytetracycline, calcein or calcein blue. North American
Journal of Fisheries Management 14:143-150.
Gauldie, R. W. and D. G. A. Nelson. 1990. Otolith
growth in fishes. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 97A (2): 119-135.
Hendricks, M.
L., T. R. Bender, Jr. and V. A. Mudrak. 1991. Job III. American shad hatchery operations.
In: Restoration of American shad to the Susquehanna River, Annual Progress Report, 1990.
Susquehanna River Anadromous Fish Restoration Committee.
Hendricks, M. L., T. R. Bender,
Jr. and V. A. Mudrak. 1992. Job III. American shad hatchery operations. In: Restoration of
American shad to the Susquehanna River, Annual Progress Report, 1991. Susquehanna River Anadromous
Fish Restoration Committee.
Hendricks, M. L. and T. R. Bender, Jr. 1993. Job III. American
shad hatchery operations. In: Restoration of American shad to the Susquehanna River, Annual
Progress Report, 1992. Susquehanna River Anadromous Fish Restoration Committee.
Hendricks,
M. L. and T. R. Bender, Jr. 1994. Job III. American shad hatchery operations. In: Restoration
of American shad to the Susquehanna River, Annual Progress Report, 1993. Susquehanna River
Anadromous Fish Restoration Committee.
Hendricks, M. L. and T. R. Bender, Jr. 1995. Job III.
American shad hatchery operations. In: Restoration of American shad to the Susquehanna River,
Annual Progress Report, 1994. Susquehanna River Anadromous Fish Restoration Committee.
Hendricks,
M. L. 1996. Job III. American shad hatchery operations. In: Restoration of American shad
to the Susquehanna River, Annual Progress Report, 1995. Susquehanna River Anadromous Fish
Restoration Committee.
Hendricks, M. L. 1997. Job III. American shad hatchery operations.
In: Restoration of American shad to the Susquehanna River, Annual Progress Report, 1996.
Susquehanna River Anadromous Fish Restoration Committee.
Hendricks, M. L. 1998. Job III.
American shad hatchery operations. In: Restoration of American shad to the Susquehanna River,
Annual Progress Report, 1997. Susquehanna River Anadromous Fish Restoration Committee.
Hendricks,
M. L. 1999. Job III. American shad hatchery operations. In: Restoration of American shad
to the Susquehanna River, Annual Progress Report, 1998. Susquehanna River Anadromous Fish
Restoration Committee.
Hendricks, M. L. 2001. Job III. American shad hatchery operations.
In: Restoration of American shad to the Susquehanna River, Annual Progress Report, 2000.
Susquehanna River Anadromous Fish Restoration Committee.
Hendricks, M. L. 2002. Job III.
American shad hatchery operations. In: Restoration of American shad to the Susquehanna River,
Annual Progress Report, 2001. Susquehanna River Anadromous Fish Restoration Committee.
Hendricks,
M. L. 2003. Job III. American shad hatchery operations. In: Restoration of American shad
to the Susquehanna River, Annual Progress Report, 2002. Susquehanna River Anadromous Fish
Restoration Committee.
Hendricks, M. L. 2004. Job III. American shad hatchery operations.
In: Restoration of American shad to the Susquehanna River, Annual Progress Report, 2003.
Susquehanna River Anadromous Fish Restoration Committee.
Hendricks, M. L. 2005. Job III.
American shad hatchery operations. In: Restoration of American shad to the Susquehanna River,
Annual Progress Report, 2004. Susquehanna River Anadromous Fish Restoration Committee.
Ott,
L. 1977. An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. Duxberry Press, Belmont,
California 730 p. |